Skip to Content
Main content

JERICHO UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

894
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,023

LEVEL 1

35

3%

LEVEL 2

94

9%

LEVEL 3

234

23%

LEVEL 4

660

65%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

927
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,048

LEVEL 1

37

4%

LEVEL 2

84

8%

LEVEL 3

219

21%

LEVEL 4

708

68%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

403
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

47

10%

LEVEL 3

108

23%

LEVEL 4

295

63%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

418
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

14

3%

LEVEL 2

45

9%

LEVEL 3

97

20%

LEVEL 4

321

67%

MALE

PROFICIENT

491
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

47

8%

LEVEL 3

126

23%

LEVEL 4

365

65%

MALE

PROFICIENT

509
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

23

4%

LEVEL 2

39

7%

LEVEL 3

122

21%

LEVEL 4

387

68%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

627
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 679

LEVEL 1

14

2%

LEVEL 2

38

6%

LEVEL 3

131

19%

LEVEL 4

496

73%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

668
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 723

LEVEL 1

14

2%

LEVEL 2

41

6%

LEVEL 3

119

16%

LEVEL 4

549

76%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

225
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

41

15%

LEVEL 3

82

30%

LEVEL 4

143

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

214
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

34

13%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

135

52%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

8

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

9

35%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

11

39%

LEVEL 4

8

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

14

48%

LEVEL 4

11

38%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

855
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 937

LEVEL 1

16

2%

LEVEL 2

66

7%

LEVEL 3

211

23%

LEVEL 4

644

69%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

882
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 957

LEVEL 1

20

2%

LEVEL 2

55

6%

LEVEL 3

193

20%

LEVEL 4

689

72%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

39
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

19

22%

LEVEL 2

28

33%

LEVEL 3

23

27%

LEVEL 4

16

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

45
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

17

19%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

19

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

840
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 953

LEVEL 1

31

3%

LEVEL 2

82

9%

LEVEL 3

213

22%

LEVEL 4

627

66%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

877
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 979

LEVEL 1

30

3%

LEVEL 2

72

7%

LEVEL 3

198

20%

LEVEL 4

679

69%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

54
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

33

47%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

50
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

29

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

807
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 913

LEVEL 1

29

3%

LEVEL 2

77

8%

LEVEL 3

203

22%

LEVEL 4

604

66%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

822
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 911

LEVEL 1

25

3%

LEVEL 2

64

7%

LEVEL 3

184

20%

LEVEL 4

638

70%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

17

15%

LEVEL 3

31

28%

LEVEL 4

56

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

20

15%

LEVEL 3

35

26%

LEVEL 4

70

51%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

892
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,017

LEVEL 1

32

3%

LEVEL 2

93

9%

LEVEL 3

232

23%

LEVEL 4

660

65%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

927
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,042

LEVEL 1

33

3%

LEVEL 2

82

8%

LEVEL 3

219

21%

LEVEL 4

708

68%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.