GEORGE A JACKSON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

23

10%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

161

67%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

22

9%

LEVEL 3

30

12%

LEVEL 4

185

74%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

81

66%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

14

10%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

98

73%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

12

10%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

80

69%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

8

7%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

87

75%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

169
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

12

7%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

138

75%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

194
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

10

5%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

172

81%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

29
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

18

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

16
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

12

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

19

9%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

158

71%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

14

6%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

180

79%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

193
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

19

9%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

157

71%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

201
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

17

7%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

177

78%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

8

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

183
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

19

9%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

145

68%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

188
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

18

8%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

164

77%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

16

59%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

21

57%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.