JERICHO MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

392
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

45

10%

LEVEL 3

98

22%

LEVEL 4

294

65%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

392
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

36

8%

LEVEL 3

108

24%

LEVEL 4

284

64%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

170
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

22

11%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

125

64%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

179
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

18

9%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

136

68%

MALE

PROFICIENT

222
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

23

9%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

169

66%

MALE

PROFICIENT

213
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

18

8%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

148

62%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

281
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

18

6%

LEVEL 3

55

18%

LEVEL 4

226

73%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

273
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

18

6%

LEVEL 3

61

21%

LEVEL 4

212

72%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

22

18%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

59

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

38

33%

LEVEL 4

59

51%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

7

54%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

372
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

31

8%

LEVEL 3

84

20%

LEVEL 4

288

70%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

369
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

26

6%

LEVEL 3

92

23%

LEVEL 4

277

69%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

9

21%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

16

40%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

366
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

14

3%

LEVEL 2

42

10%

LEVEL 3

90

21%

LEVEL 4

276

65%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

374
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

33

8%

LEVEL 3

102

24%

LEVEL 4

272

65%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

26
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

18

58%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

18
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

12

55%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

354
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

14

3%

LEVEL 2

39

10%

LEVEL 3

86

21%

LEVEL 4

268

66%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

338
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

27

7%

LEVEL 3

87

23%

LEVEL 4

251

67%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

26

57%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

21

32%

LEVEL 4

33

50%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.