OYSTER BAY-EAST NORWICH CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

53

14%

LEVEL 2

80

21%

LEVEL 3

136

35%

LEVEL 4

121

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

300
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

53

12%

LEVEL 2

84

19%

LEVEL 3

147

34%

LEVEL 4

153

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

48

26%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

54

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

29

14%

LEVEL 2

40

20%

LEVEL 3

73

36%

LEVEL 4

61

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

149
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

32

15%

LEVEL 3

82

39%

LEVEL 4

67

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

166
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

44

19%

LEVEL 3

74

32%

LEVEL 4

92

39%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

13

59%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

11

48%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

9

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

184
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

49

20%

LEVEL 3

104

42%

LEVEL 4

80

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

218
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

58

20%

LEVEL 3

107

37%

LEVEL 4

111

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

31

37%

LEVEL 2

20

24%

LEVEL 3

20

24%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

29

35%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

20

24%

LEVEL 4

17

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

70

20%

LEVEL 3

128

36%

LEVEL 4

120

34%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

66

17%

LEVEL 3

137

35%

LEVEL 4

148

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

15

44%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

16

33%

LEVEL 2

18

37%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

252
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

74

21%

LEVEL 3

133

37%

LEVEL 4

119

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

298
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

33

8%

LEVEL 2

78

19%

LEVEL 3

146

36%

LEVEL 4

152

37%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

22

67%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

20

71%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

227
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

59

19%

LEVEL 3

120

39%

LEVEL 4

107

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

263
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

68

19%

LEVEL 3

125

36%

LEVEL 4

138

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

32

39%

LEVEL 2

21

25%

LEVEL 3

16

19%

LEVEL 4

14

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

32

38%

LEVEL 2

16

19%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

15

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.