H B THOMPSON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

35

10%

LEVEL 3

110

33%

LEVEL 4

178

53%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

336
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

37

10%

LEVEL 3

101

26%

LEVEL 4

235

61%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

133
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

22

14%

LEVEL 3

59

37%

LEVEL 4

74

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

18

10%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

110

62%

MALE

PROFICIENT

155
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

13

7%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

104

58%

MALE

PROFICIENT

179
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

19

9%

LEVEL 3

54

26%

LEVEL 4

125

60%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

179
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

15

8%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

117

59%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

220
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

11

5%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

163

69%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

38

34%

LEVEL 4

56

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

20

16%

LEVEL 3

37

29%

LEVEL 4

63

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

7

44%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

30

10%

LEVEL 3

99

32%

LEVEL 4

174

56%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

327
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

32

9%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

231

64%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

10

33%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

11

37%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

277
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

33

10%

LEVEL 3

106

33%

LEVEL 4

171

53%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

330
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

34

9%

LEVEL 3

99

26%

LEVEL 4

231

62%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

7

47%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

265
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

30

10%

LEVEL 3

97

32%

LEVEL 4

168

55%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

300
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

33

10%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

213

62%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

5

15%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

13

39%

LEVEL 4

10

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

14

34%

LEVEL 4

22

54%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.