Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTH GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

24

12%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

118

59%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

118

58%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

26

28%

LEVEL 4

51

54%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

32

31%

LEVEL 4

54

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

67

64%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

23

23%

LEVEL 4

64

65%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

128
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

14

10%

LEVEL 3

32

22%

LEVEL 4

96

66%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

129
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

13

9%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

94

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

29
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

13

36%

LEVEL 4

16

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

35
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

19

45%

LEVEL 4

16

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

21

11%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

116

61%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

19

10%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

116

61%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

159
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

22

12%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

114

61%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

166
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

21

11%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

113

59%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

20

12%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

107

62%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

19

11%

LEVEL 3

47

27%

LEVEL 4

104

60%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

11

41%

LEVEL 4

11

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

14

50%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.