NORTH SHORE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

554
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

17

3%

LEVEL 2

72

11%

LEVEL 3

205

32%

LEVEL 4

349

54%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

559
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 627

LEVEL 1

15

2%

LEVEL 2

53

8%

LEVEL 3

170

27%

LEVEL 4

389

62%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

280
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

33

10%

LEVEL 3

118

37%

LEVEL 4

162

51%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

250
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

22

8%

LEVEL 3

72

26%

LEVEL 4

178

64%

MALE

PROFICIENT

274
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

39

12%

LEVEL 3

87

27%

LEVEL 4

187

57%

MALE

PROFICIENT

309
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

31

9%

LEVEL 3

98

28%

LEVEL 4

211

60%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

46
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

34

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

49
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

39

78%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

431
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

11

2%

LEVEL 2

55

11%

LEVEL 3

164

33%

LEVEL 4

267

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

427
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

40

8%

LEVEL 3

133

28%

LEVEL 4

294

62%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

32

46%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

40

53%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

519
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

47

8%

LEVEL 3

184

32%

LEVEL 4

335

59%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

521
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 562

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

37

7%

LEVEL 3

151

27%

LEVEL 4

370

66%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

11

15%

LEVEL 2

25

35%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

14

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

38
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

11

17%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

19

29%

LEVEL 4

19

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

545
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

16

3%

LEVEL 2

69

11%

LEVEL 3

201

32%

LEVEL 4

344

55%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

551
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 616

LEVEL 1

14

2%

LEVEL 2

51

8%

LEVEL 3

165

27%

LEVEL 4

386

63%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

5

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

497
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

16

3%

LEVEL 2

58

10%

LEVEL 3

176

31%

LEVEL 4

321

56%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

513
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

12

2%

LEVEL 2

44

8%

LEVEL 3

149

26%

LEVEL 4

364

64%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

14

19%

LEVEL 3

29

40%

LEVEL 4

28

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

21

36%

LEVEL 4

25

43%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.