CENTER STREET SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

29

13%

LEVEL 3

71

31%

LEVEL 4

113

50%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

33

13%

LEVEL 3

73

30%

LEVEL 4

128

52%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

14

14%

LEVEL 3

34

33%

LEVEL 4

49

48%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

17

16%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

53

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

15

12%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

64

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

16

12%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

75

54%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

5

63%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

126
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

17

11%

LEVEL 3

45

29%

LEVEL 4

81

53%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

149
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

17

10%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

100

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

22

36%

LEVEL 4

25

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

40
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

19

33%

LEVEL 4

21

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

113

55%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

70

32%

LEVEL 4

124

57%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

12

55%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

10

37%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

181
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

22

10%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

112

52%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

196
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

26

11%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

126

55%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

27

14%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

101

51%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

28

14%

LEVEL 3

61

29%

LEVEL 4

110

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

12

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

18

47%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.