Skip to Content
Main content

DENTON AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

49

14%

LEVEL 3

111

33%

LEVEL 4

163

48%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

40

12%

LEVEL 3

101

30%

LEVEL 4

185

56%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

26

16%

LEVEL 3

45

28%

LEVEL 4

82

51%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

23

14%

LEVEL 3

47

30%

LEVEL 4

87

55%

MALE

PROFICIENT

147
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

23

13%

LEVEL 3

66

37%

LEVEL 4

81

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

17

10%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

98

57%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

224
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

23

9%

LEVEL 3

87

34%

LEVEL 4

137

54%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

220
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

25

10%

LEVEL 3

66

27%

LEVEL 4

154

62%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

34
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

15

27%

LEVEL 4

19

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

22

41%

LEVEL 4

20

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

6

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

41

13%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

161

51%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

277
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

35

11%

LEVEL 3

97

31%

LEVEL 4

180

57%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

271
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

42

13%

LEVEL 3

109

34%

LEVEL 4

162

50%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

277
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

34

11%

LEVEL 3

93

29%

LEVEL 4

184

58%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

8

53%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

252
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

40

13%

LEVEL 3

104

34%

LEVEL 4

148

49%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

265
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

33

11%

LEVEL 3

93

31%

LEVEL 4

172

57%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

15

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

13

46%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.