Skip to Content
Main content

SEARINGTOWN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

28

12%

LEVEL 3

63

27%

LEVEL 4

133

57%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

37

13%

LEVEL 3

87

30%

LEVEL 4

152

53%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

14

13%

LEVEL 3

29

27%

LEVEL 4

60

57%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

16

13%

LEVEL 3

50

39%

LEVEL 4

58

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

73

57%

MALE

PROFICIENT

131
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

21

13%

LEVEL 3

37

23%

LEVEL 4

94

59%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

147
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

20

12%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

105

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

179
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

24

12%

LEVEL 3

62

30%

LEVEL 4

117

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

18

36%

LEVEL 4

24

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

19

31%

LEVEL 4

28

46%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

20

10%

LEVEL 3

58

28%

LEVEL 4

126

61%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

27

11%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

146

57%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

7

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

182
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

126

59%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

224
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

30

11%

LEVEL 3

77

29%

LEVEL 4

147

56%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

7

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

15
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

5

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

187
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

21

10%

LEVEL 3

57

27%

LEVEL 4

130

61%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

214
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

27

11%

LEVEL 3

75

30%

LEVEL 4

139

56%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

13

34%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.