GREAT NECK NORTH MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

49

12%

LEVEL 2

67

16%

LEVEL 3

117

28%

LEVEL 4

189

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

337
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

39

8%

LEVEL 2

96

20%

LEVEL 3

135

29%

LEVEL 4

202

43%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

34

17%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

88

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

156
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

47

21%

LEVEL 3

67

30%

LEVEL 4

89

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

161
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

101

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

181
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

49

20%

LEVEL 3

68

28%

LEVEL 4

113

46%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

81
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

5

6%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

63

71%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

109
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

13

10%

LEVEL 3

28

22%

LEVEL 4

81

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

209
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

48

17%

LEVEL 3

91

32%

LEVEL 4

118

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

211
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

65

22%

LEVEL 3

96

32%

LEVEL 4

115

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

14

41%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

10

28%

LEVEL 2

15

42%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

287
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

53

15%

LEVEL 3

105

29%

LEVEL 4

182

51%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

308
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

69

18%

LEVEL 3

115

30%

LEVEL 4

193

50%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

29

47%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

12

19%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

29
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

29

34%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

20

24%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

298
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

35

9%

LEVEL 2

67

17%

LEVEL 3

113

28%

LEVEL 4

185

46%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

326
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

87

20%

LEVEL 3

128

29%

LEVEL 4

198

45%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

14

64%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

275
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

53

15%

LEVEL 3

105

29%

LEVEL 4

170

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

286
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

75

19%

LEVEL 3

107

28%

LEVEL 4

179

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

19

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

14

16%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

28

33%

LEVEL 4

23

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.