Skip to Content
Main content

GREAT NECK SOUTH MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

500
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

36

6%

LEVEL 2

60

10%

LEVEL 3

153

26%

LEVEL 4

347

58%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

480
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 573

LEVEL 1

37

6%

LEVEL 2

56

10%

LEVEL 3

132

23%

LEVEL 4

348

61%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

251
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

31

10%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

182

61%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

243
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

29

10%

LEVEL 3

68

24%

LEVEL 4

175

61%

MALE

PROFICIENT

249
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

29

10%

LEVEL 3

84

28%

LEVEL 4

165

56%

MALE

PROFICIENT

237
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

27

9%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

173

61%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

8

67%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

368
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

23

6%

LEVEL 3

92

23%

LEVEL 4

276

68%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

375
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

26

6%

LEVEL 3

80

19%

LEVEL 4

295

71%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

27

20%

LEVEL 3

39

29%

LEVEL 4

58

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

21

21%

LEVEL 3

31

30%

LEVEL 4

37

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

8

18%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

18

41%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

18

46%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

472
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

7

1%

LEVEL 2

44

8%

LEVEL 3

135

26%

LEVEL 4

337

64%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

458
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

36

7%

LEVEL 3

123

25%

LEVEL 4

335

67%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

29

40%

LEVEL 2

16

22%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

10

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

31

42%

LEVEL 2

20

27%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

13

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

487
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

30

5%

LEVEL 2

55

10%

LEVEL 3

147

26%

LEVEL 4

340

59%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

470
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 554

LEVEL 1

32

6%

LEVEL 2

52

9%

LEVEL 3

129

23%

LEVEL 4

341

62%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

7

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

7

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

440
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

26

5%

LEVEL 2

44

9%

LEVEL 3

124

24%

LEVEL 4

316

62%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

411
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

21

4%

LEVEL 2

42

9%

LEVEL 3

106

22%

LEVEL 4

305

64%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

10

12%

LEVEL 2

16

19%

LEVEL 3

29

34%

LEVEL 4

31

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

16

16%

LEVEL 2

14

14%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

43

43%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.