E M BAKER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

39

12%

LEVEL 3

70

21%

LEVEL 4

198

60%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

284
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

43

12%

LEVEL 3

101

29%

LEVEL 4

183

53%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

18

12%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

82

55%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

25

17%

LEVEL 3

50

34%

LEVEL 4

65

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

21

12%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

116

64%

MALE

PROFICIENT

169
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

18

9%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

118

60%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

132
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

9

6%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

105

73%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

133
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

9

6%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

108

75%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

116
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

79

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

129
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

28

17%

LEVEL 3

62

38%

LEVEL 4

67

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

7

26%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

11

39%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

253
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

30

10%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

191

64%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

32

10%

LEVEL 3

89

29%

LEVEL 4

179

59%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

15

36%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

258
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

35

11%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

194

61%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

271
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

40

12%

LEVEL 3

97

30%

LEVEL 4

174

53%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

13
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

9

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

241
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

30

11%

LEVEL 3

64

23%

LEVEL 4

177

62%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

247
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

35

12%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

162

55%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

11

23%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

21

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

10

18%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

16

29%

LEVEL 4

21

38%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.