Skip to Content
Main content

NEW HYDE PARK-GARDEN CITY PARK UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

622
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 767

LEVEL 1

45

6%

LEVEL 2

100

13%

LEVEL 3

247

32%

LEVEL 4

375

49%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

619
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 776

LEVEL 1

36

5%

LEVEL 2

121

16%

LEVEL 3

245

32%

LEVEL 4

374

48%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

276
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

48

14%

LEVEL 3

113

32%

LEVEL 4

163

46%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

281
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

70

19%

LEVEL 3

110

30%

LEVEL 4

171

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

346
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

52

13%

LEVEL 3

134

32%

LEVEL 4

212

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

338
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

51

12%

LEVEL 3

135

33%

LEVEL 4

203

50%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

12

63%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

12

63%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

410
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

23

5%

LEVEL 2

56

11%

LEVEL 3

143

29%

LEVEL 4

267

55%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

415
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

71

14%

LEVEL 3

153

30%

LEVEL 4

262

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

129
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

21

13%

LEVEL 3

63

39%

LEVEL 4

66

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

25

16%

LEVEL 3

54

35%

LEVEL 4

70

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

35

38%

LEVEL 4

29

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

32

35%

LEVEL 4

29

32%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

606
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 722

LEVEL 1

25

3%

LEVEL 2

91

13%

LEVEL 3

235

33%

LEVEL 4

371

51%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

600
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 733

LEVEL 1

19

3%

LEVEL 2

114

16%

LEVEL 3

233

32%

LEVEL 4

367

50%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

20

44%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

17

40%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

12

28%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

612
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 746

LEVEL 1

40

5%

LEVEL 2

94

13%

LEVEL 3

239

32%

LEVEL 4

373

50%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

608
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 750

LEVEL 1

27

4%

LEVEL 2

115

15%

LEVEL 3

238

32%

LEVEL 4

370

49%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

9

35%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

504
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

30

5%

LEVEL 2

77

13%

LEVEL 3

189

31%

LEVEL 4

315

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

494
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 610

LEVEL 1

26

4%

LEVEL 2

90

15%

LEVEL 3

191

31%

LEVEL 4

303

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

23

15%

LEVEL 3

58

37%

LEVEL 4

60

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

31

19%

LEVEL 3

54

33%

LEVEL 4

71

43%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.