NEW HYDE PARK ROAD SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

21

8%

LEVEL 3

66

26%

LEVEL 4

156

61%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

31

12%

LEVEL 3

71

28%

LEVEL 4

138

54%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

25

25%

LEVEL 4

60

59%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

28

27%

LEVEL 4

56

54%

MALE

PROFICIENT

137
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

14

9%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

96

62%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

19

13%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

82

54%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

127
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

13

9%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

98

68%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

127
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

17

11%

LEVEL 3

46

31%

LEVEL 4

81

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

20

33%

LEVEL 4

34

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

14

23%

LEVEL 4

35

58%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

15

41%

LEVEL 4

13

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

13

41%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

18

7%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

155

64%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

29

12%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

134

57%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

220
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

20

8%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

155

62%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

206
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

31

13%

LEVEL 3

70

28%

LEVEL 4

136

55%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

12

6%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

130

68%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

23

12%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

110

56%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

24

37%

LEVEL 4

26

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

18

31%

LEVEL 4

28

48%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.