JOHN PHILIP SOUSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

58

21%

LEVEL 3

91

34%

LEVEL 4

104

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

43

18%

LEVEL 3

86

36%

LEVEL 4

96

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

31

25%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

47

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

41

37%

LEVEL 4

40

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

27

18%

LEVEL 3

54

36%

LEVEL 4

57

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

18

14%

LEVEL 3

45

36%

LEVEL 4

56

45%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

12

60%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

13

59%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

12

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

42

21%

LEVEL 3

73

37%

LEVEL 4

74

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

23

14%

LEVEL 3

62

38%

LEVEL 4

72

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

10

30%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

15

39%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

42

18%

LEVEL 3

77

33%

LEVEL 4

100

43%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

67

34%

LEVEL 4

88

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

16

42%

LEVEL 3

14

37%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

19

51%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

194
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

55

21%

LEVEL 3

90

35%

LEVEL 4

104

40%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

181
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

42

18%

LEVEL 3

85

37%

LEVEL 4

96

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

184
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

49

20%

LEVEL 3

89

37%

LEVEL 4

95

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

30

15%

LEVEL 3

78

38%

LEVEL 4

90

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

9

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.