Skip to Content
Main content

ROSLYN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

59

17%

LEVEL 3

108

31%

LEVEL 4

153

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

51

15%

LEVEL 3

100

30%

LEVEL 4

162

48%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

33

20%

LEVEL 3

56

35%

LEVEL 4

62

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

133
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

22

13%

LEVEL 3

54

33%

LEVEL 4

79

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

26

14%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

91

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

29

17%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

83

49%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

66
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

48

61%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

66
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

12

15%

LEVEL 3

21

26%

LEVEL 4

45

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

180
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

34

15%

LEVEL 3

81

35%

LEVEL 4

99

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

175
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

29

13%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

110

51%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

11

52%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

8

40%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

54

17%

LEVEL 3

103

32%

LEVEL 4

152

47%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

42

13%

LEVEL 3

97

31%

LEVEL 4

161

51%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

10

48%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

11

46%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

259
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

57

17%

LEVEL 3

107

32%

LEVEL 4

152

45%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

259
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

48

15%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

160

49%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

234
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

42

14%

LEVEL 3

95

32%

LEVEL 4

139

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

241
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

37

13%

LEVEL 3

88

30%

LEVEL 4

153

52%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

14

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

14

31%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.