Skip to Content
Main content

EAST WILLISTON UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

485
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 553

LEVEL 1

16

3%

LEVEL 2

52

9%

LEVEL 3

149

27%

LEVEL 4

336

61%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

498
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

27

5%

LEVEL 2

49

9%

LEVEL 3

142

25%

LEVEL 4

356

62%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

233
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

27

10%

LEVEL 3

75

28%

LEVEL 4

158

60%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

242
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

24

9%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

177

65%

MALE

PROFICIENT

252
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

25

9%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

178

62%

MALE

PROFICIENT

256
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

25

8%

LEVEL 3

77

26%

LEVEL 4

179

60%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

8

47%

LEVEL 4

9

53%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

13

62%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

171
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

7

4%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

136

74%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

182
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

8

4%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

146

74%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

262
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

42

13%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

171

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

265
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

30

10%

LEVEL 3

87

28%

LEVEL 4

178

57%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

13

37%

LEVEL 4

16

46%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

13

38%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

464
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

36

7%

LEVEL 3

137

27%

LEVEL 4

327

65%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

481
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

35

7%

LEVEL 3

131

25%

LEVEL 4

350

67%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

11

23%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

12

25%

LEVEL 4

9

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

21

40%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

474
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

10

2%

LEVEL 2

52

10%

LEVEL 3

145

27%

LEVEL 4

329

61%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

490
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

21

4%

LEVEL 2

46

8%

LEVEL 3

137

25%

LEVEL 4

353

63%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

7

41%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

453
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

11

2%

LEVEL 2

49

10%

LEVEL 3

136

27%

LEVEL 4

317

62%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

459
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

18

3%

LEVEL 2

44

8%

LEVEL 3

128

25%

LEVEL 4

331

64%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

19

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

9

17%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

25

47%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.