ROSLYN UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

725
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 916

LEVEL 1

42

5%

LEVEL 2

149

16%

LEVEL 3

306

33%

LEVEL 4

419

46%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

741
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 941

LEVEL 1

49

5%

LEVEL 2

151

16%

LEVEL 3

265

28%

LEVEL 4

476

51%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

347
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

93

20%

LEVEL 3

153

33%

LEVEL 4

194

42%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

377
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

80

17%

LEVEL 3

145

30%

LEVEL 4

232

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

378
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

24

5%

LEVEL 2

56

12%

LEVEL 3

153

33%

LEVEL 4

225

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

364
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

71

15%

LEVEL 3

120

26%

LEVEL 4

244

53%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

185
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

15

7%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

129

61%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

197
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

21

9%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

141

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

493
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 608

LEVEL 1

22

4%

LEVEL 2

93

15%

LEVEL 3

224

37%

LEVEL 4

269

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

497
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

20

3%

LEVEL 2

86

14%

LEVEL 3

185

31%

LEVEL 4

312

52%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

14

52%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

9

35%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

27

42%

LEVEL 3

19

30%

LEVEL 4

12

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

13

17%

LEVEL 2

33

43%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

13

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

708
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 866

LEVEL 1

27

3%

LEVEL 2

131

15%

LEVEL 3

294

34%

LEVEL 4

414

48%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

726
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 886

LEVEL 1

29

3%

LEVEL 2

131

15%

LEVEL 3

258

29%

LEVEL 4

468

53%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

15

30%

LEVEL 2

18

36%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

20

36%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

8

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

719
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 888

LEVEL 1

31

3%

LEVEL 2

138

16%

LEVEL 3

301

34%

LEVEL 4

418

47%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

735
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 907

LEVEL 1

38

4%

LEVEL 2

134

15%

LEVEL 3

262

29%

LEVEL 4

473

52%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

11

39%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

11

32%

LEVEL 2

17

50%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

665
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 804

LEVEL 1

30

4%

LEVEL 2

109

14%

LEVEL 3

270

34%

LEVEL 4

395

49%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

690
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 825

LEVEL 1

28

3%

LEVEL 2

107

13%

LEVEL 3

238

29%

LEVEL 4

452

55%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

12

11%

LEVEL 2

40

36%

LEVEL 3

36

32%

LEVEL 4

24

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

21

18%

LEVEL 2

44

38%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

24

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.