Skip to Content
Main content

PARK AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

255

56%

LEVEL 2

114

25%

LEVEL 3

57

12%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

218

51%

LEVEL 2

118

28%

LEVEL 3

43

10%

LEVEL 4

46

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

105

50%

LEVEL 2

56

27%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

95

46%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

150

60%

LEVEL 2

58

23%

LEVEL 3

24

10%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

123

57%

LEVEL 2

49

23%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

166

52%

LEVEL 2

84

26%

LEVEL 3

41

13%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

146

49%

LEVEL 2

90

30%

LEVEL 3

32

11%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

241

55%

LEVEL 2

110

25%

LEVEL 3

57

13%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

196

49%

LEVEL 2

117

29%

LEVEL 3

43

11%

LEVEL 4

46

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

14

74%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

22

96%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

77
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

103

43%

LEVEL 2

59

25%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

80
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

94

39%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

46

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

152

69%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

10

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

124

67%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

29

57%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

22

50%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

10

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

226

55%

LEVEL 2

106

26%

LEVEL 3

48

12%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

196

51%

LEVEL 2

112

29%

LEVEL 3

37

10%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.