Skip to Content
Main content

FLORAL PARK MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

48

22%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

51

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

55

28%

LEVEL 4

55

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

25

27%

LEVEL 2

28

30%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

21

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

11

14%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

24

30%

LEVEL 4

26

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

30

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

37

33%

LEVEL 3

31

27%

LEVEL 4

29

26%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

9

19%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

13

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

15

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

59
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

20

17%

LEVEL 2

38

32%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

31

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

33

33%

LEVEL 4

35

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

10

30%

LEVEL 2

15

45%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

50

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

54

32%

LEVEL 4

54

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

23

56%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

15

58%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

107
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

45

21%

LEVEL 2

66

30%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

51

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

109
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

55

29%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

55

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

51

31%

LEVEL 3

47

28%

LEVEL 4

44

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

53

32%

LEVEL 4

50

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

23

41%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

8

27%

LEVEL 2

15

50%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.