Skip to Content
Main content

NEW HYDE PARK MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

71

28%

LEVEL 3

82

32%

LEVEL 4

61

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

73

29%

LEVEL 4

78

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

34

32%

LEVEL 4

29

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

26

24%

LEVEL 3

30

28%

LEVEL 4

42

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

48

32%

LEVEL 4

32

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

17

12%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

43

30%

LEVEL 4

36

25%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

110
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

52

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

105
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

59

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

19

38%

LEVEL 3

15

30%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

28
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

13

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

11

44%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

11

35%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

79

35%

LEVEL 4

61

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

71

31%

LEVEL 4

77

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

21

78%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

140
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

36

15%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

79

33%

LEVEL 4

61

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

148
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

72

30%

LEVEL 3

71

29%

LEVEL 4

77

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

46

25%

LEVEL 3

62

34%

LEVEL 4

53

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

53

29%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

65

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

19

26%

LEVEL 2

25

35%

LEVEL 3

20

28%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

11

16%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

23

34%

LEVEL 4

13

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.