Skip to Content
Main content

BELLMORE-MERRICK CENTRAL HS DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

65

17%

LEVEL 2

111

29%

LEVEL 3

124

32%

LEVEL 4

83

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

40

10%

LEVEL 2

109

27%

LEVEL 3

138

35%

LEVEL 4

110

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

59

36%

LEVEL 4

33

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

48

25%

LEVEL 3

75

38%

LEVEL 4

54

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

50

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

61

30%

LEVEL 3

63

31%

LEVEL 4

56

28%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

19

35%

LEVEL 4

18

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

17

37%

LEVEL 4

17

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

44

17%

LEVEL 2

72

27%

LEVEL 3

89

34%

LEVEL 4

58

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

177
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

74

27%

LEVEL 3

97

35%

LEVEL 4

80

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

8

20%

LEVEL 2

20

49%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

11

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

96

30%

LEVEL 3

120

37%

LEVEL 4

83

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

82

24%

LEVEL 3

131

38%

LEVEL 4

108

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

42

69%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

18

33%

LEVEL 2

27

50%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

247
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

37

9%

LEVEL 2

107

27%

LEVEL 3

137

35%

LEVEL 4

110

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

192
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

50

15%

LEVEL 2

96

28%

LEVEL 3

116

34%

LEVEL 4

76

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

235
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

94

26%

LEVEL 3

128

36%

LEVEL 4

107

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

15

33%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

12

30%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

10

25%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.