ISLAND PARK UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

57

24%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

70

29%

LEVEL 4

49

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

47

18%

LEVEL 2

67

26%

LEVEL 3

73

28%

LEVEL 4

74

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

34

26%

LEVEL 2

31

24%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

28

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

27

19%

LEVEL 2

32

23%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

40

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

23

21%

LEVEL 2

33

30%

LEVEL 3

32

29%

LEVEL 4

21

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

20

16%

LEVEL 2

35

29%

LEVEL 3

33

27%

LEVEL 4

34

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

7

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

25

21%

LEVEL 2

25

21%

LEVEL 3

38

32%

LEVEL 4

29

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

44

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

29

29%

LEVEL 2

30

30%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

14

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

25

22%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

40

35%

LEVEL 4

21

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

39

18%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

49

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

33

14%

LEVEL 2

57

24%

LEVEL 3

72

31%

LEVEL 4

74

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

18

69%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

14

56%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

112
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

42

20%

LEVEL 2

57

27%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

48

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

138
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

58

26%

LEVEL 3

65

29%

LEVEL 4

73

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

15

52%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

19

51%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

28

21%

LEVEL 2

31

23%

LEVEL 3

42

31%

LEVEL 4

35

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

52

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

29

28%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

28

27%

LEVEL 4

14

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

35

30%

LEVEL 2

27

23%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

22

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.