MERRICK UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

316
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

65

16%

LEVEL 3

166

41%

LEVEL 4

150

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

413
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

19

4%

LEVEL 2

71

14%

LEVEL 3

187

37%

LEVEL 4

226

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

36

18%

LEVEL 3

86

44%

LEVEL 4

67

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

193
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

40

16%

LEVEL 3

92

38%

LEVEL 4

101

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

163
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

29

14%

LEVEL 3

80

39%

LEVEL 4

83

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

220
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

31

12%

LEVEL 3

95

37%

LEVEL 4

125

48%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

16

39%

LEVEL 4

18

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

14

37%

LEVEL 4

20

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

253
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

50

16%

LEVEL 3

128

40%

LEVEL 4

125

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

344
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

56

13%

LEVEL 3

156

38%

LEVEL 4

188

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

15

56%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

13

34%

LEVEL 4

13

34%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

309
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

61

16%

LEVEL 3

161

42%

LEVEL 4

148

39%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

400
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

10

2%

LEVEL 2

60

13%

LEVEL 3

180

38%

LEVEL 4

220

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

9

27%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

412
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

16

3%

LEVEL 2

70

14%

LEVEL 3

186

37%

LEVEL 4

226

45%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

299
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

59

16%

LEVEL 3

154

41%

LEVEL 4

145

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

389
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

16

3%

LEVEL 2

65

14%

LEVEL 3

173

37%

LEVEL 4

216

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

12

43%

LEVEL 4

5

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

14

42%

LEVEL 4

10

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.