ROCKVILLE CENTRE UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

439
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

46

7%

LEVEL 2

157

24%

LEVEL 3

242

38%

LEVEL 4

197

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

556
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 756

LEVEL 1

57

8%

LEVEL 2

143

19%

LEVEL 3

286

38%

LEVEL 4

270

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

205
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

69

24%

LEVEL 3

112

38%

LEVEL 4

93

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

252
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

78

22%

LEVEL 3

127

36%

LEVEL 4

125

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

234
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

88

25%

LEVEL 3

130

37%

LEVEL 4

104

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

304
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

38

9%

LEVEL 2

65

16%

LEVEL 3

159

39%

LEVEL 4

145

36%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

12

41%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

23
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

13

41%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

358
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

21

4%

LEVEL 2

102

21%

LEVEL 3

195

41%

LEVEL 4

163

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

443
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 562

LEVEL 1

29

5%

LEVEL 2

90

16%

LEVEL 3

228

41%

LEVEL 4

215

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

10

23%

LEVEL 2

15

35%

LEVEL 3

16

37%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

17

37%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

10

13%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

22

29%

LEVEL 4

17

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

15

16%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

27

29%

LEVEL 4

27

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

428
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

26

4%

LEVEL 2

144

24%

LEVEL 3

235

39%

LEVEL 4

193

32%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

542
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 703

LEVEL 1

29

4%

LEVEL 2

132

19%

LEVEL 3

276

39%

LEVEL 4

266

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

20

45%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

28

53%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

424
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

32

5%

LEVEL 2

129

22%

LEVEL 3

233

40%

LEVEL 4

191

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

531
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 695

LEVEL 1

39

6%

LEVEL 2

125

18%

LEVEL 3

273

39%

LEVEL 4

258

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

14

25%

LEVEL 2

28

49%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

18

30%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

12

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.