LYNBROOK UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

303
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

72

14%

LEVEL 2

130

26%

LEVEL 3

164

32%

LEVEL 4

139

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

338
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

69

13%

LEVEL 2

145

26%

LEVEL 3

192

35%

LEVEL 4

146

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

69

29%

LEVEL 4

67

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

74

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

167
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

61

23%

LEVEL 3

95

36%

LEVEL 4

72

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

185
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

73

25%

LEVEL 3

113

39%

LEVEL 4

72

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

15

35%

LEVEL 4

17

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

15

35%

LEVEL 4

13

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

199
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

78

25%

LEVEL 3

109

36%

LEVEL 4

90

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

215
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

84

26%

LEVEL 3

121

37%

LEVEL 4

94

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

8

24%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

9

25%

LEVEL 4

9

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

26

25%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

28

27%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

26

22%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

40

34%

LEVEL 4

22

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

116

26%

LEVEL 3

157

35%

LEVEL 4

137

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

314
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

131

27%

LEVEL 3

175

36%

LEVEL 4

139

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

33

59%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

28

42%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

17

26%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

302
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

66

13%

LEVEL 2

129

26%

LEVEL 3

164

33%

LEVEL 4

138

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

334
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

62

12%

LEVEL 2

141

26%

LEVEL 3

189

35%

LEVEL 4

145

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

267
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

44

11%

LEVEL 2

103

25%

LEVEL 3

138

33%

LEVEL 4

129

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

294
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

42

9%

LEVEL 2

111

25%

LEVEL 3

158

35%

LEVEL 4

136

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

28

31%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

27

26%

LEVEL 2

34

32%

LEVEL 3

34

32%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

336
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

69

13%

LEVEL 2

142

26%

LEVEL 3

190

35%

LEVEL 4

146

27%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.