Skip to Content
Main content

STRATFORD AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

49

15%

LEVEL 3

118

37%

LEVEL 4

151

47%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

60

17%

LEVEL 3

135

37%

LEVEL 4

155

43%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

24

14%

LEVEL 3

54

32%

LEVEL 4

88

53%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

33

19%

LEVEL 3

66

37%

LEVEL 4

75

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

25

16%

LEVEL 3

64

41%

LEVEL 4

63

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

149
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

27

15%

LEVEL 3

69

37%

LEVEL 4

80

43%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

11

55%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

14

70%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

7

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

223
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

44

16%

LEVEL 3

98

36%

LEVEL 4

125

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

240
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

54

18%

LEVEL 3

119

39%

LEVEL 4

121

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

8

47%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

8

40%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

39

13%

LEVEL 3

109

36%

LEVEL 4

148

49%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

50

15%

LEVEL 3

128

38%

LEVEL 4

151

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

9

30%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

261
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

49

16%

LEVEL 3

115

37%

LEVEL 4

146

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

286
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

58

16%

LEVEL 3

133

37%

LEVEL 4

153

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

5

63%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.