WASHINGTON STREET SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

87

26%

LEVEL 3

114

34%

LEVEL 4

87

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

48

14%

LEVEL 2

82

23%

LEVEL 3

108

31%

LEVEL 4

111

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

57

34%

LEVEL 4

42

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

40

24%

LEVEL 3

59

35%

LEVEL 4

48

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

32

19%

LEVEL 2

37

22%

LEVEL 3

57

33%

LEVEL 4

45

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

27

15%

LEVEL 2

42

23%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

63

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

17

34%

LEVEL 4

15

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

35
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

23

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

120
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

48

26%

LEVEL 3

66

36%

LEVEL 4

54

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

41

21%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

66

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

23

27%

LEVEL 2

23

27%

LEVEL 3

24

29%

LEVEL 4

14

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

22

25%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

19

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

80

27%

LEVEL 3

107

36%

LEVEL 4

85

29%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

70

22%

LEVEL 3

107

34%

LEVEL 4

105

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

25

61%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

16

46%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

199
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

83

26%

LEVEL 3

113

35%

LEVEL 4

86

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

218
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

79

23%

LEVEL 3

107

32%

LEVEL 4

111

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

63

25%

LEVEL 3

93

36%

LEVEL 4

77

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

173
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

52

20%

LEVEL 3

80

31%

LEVEL 4

93

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

27

33%

LEVEL 2

24

29%

LEVEL 3

21

26%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

17

18%

LEVEL 2

30

32%

LEVEL 3

28

30%

LEVEL 4

18

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.