GARDEN CITY UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

954
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,152

LEVEL 1

28

2%

LEVEL 2

170

15%

LEVEL 3

398

35%

LEVEL 4

556

48%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

974
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,201

LEVEL 1

41

3%

LEVEL 2

186

15%

LEVEL 3

399

33%

LEVEL 4

575

48%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

477
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

12

2%

LEVEL 2

93

16%

LEVEL 3

188

32%

LEVEL 4

289

50%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

473
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 590

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

102

17%

LEVEL 3

190

32%

LEVEL 4

283

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

477
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

16

3%

LEVEL 2

77

14%

LEVEL 3

210

37%

LEVEL 4

267

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

501
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

26

4%

LEVEL 2

84

14%

LEVEL 3

209

34%

LEVEL 4

292

48%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

39
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

28

67%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

39
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

15

36%

LEVEL 4

24

57%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

73
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

54

71%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

82
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

62

68%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

799
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 975

LEVEL 1

24

2%

LEVEL 2

152

16%

LEVEL 3

344

35%

LEVEL 4

455

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

814
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,009

LEVEL 1

33

3%

LEVEL 2

162

16%

LEVEL 3

342

34%

LEVEL 4

472

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

21

40%

LEVEL 4

18

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

18

34%

LEVEL 4

16

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

902
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,054

LEVEL 1

13

1%

LEVEL 2

139

13%

LEVEL 3

363

34%

LEVEL 4

539

51%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

923
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,084

LEVEL 1

16

1%

LEVEL 2

145

13%

LEVEL 3

366

34%

LEVEL 4

557

51%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

52
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

15

15%

LEVEL 2

31

32%

LEVEL 3

35

36%

LEVEL 4

17

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

51
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

25

21%

LEVEL 2

41

35%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

18

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

949
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,143

LEVEL 1

25

2%

LEVEL 2

169

15%

LEVEL 3

398

35%

LEVEL 4

551

48%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

926
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,119

LEVEL 1

25

2%

LEVEL 2

168

15%

LEVEL 3

386

34%

LEVEL 4

540

48%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

951
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,167

LEVEL 1

36

3%

LEVEL 2

180

15%

LEVEL 3

387

33%

LEVEL 4

564

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

12

36%

LEVEL 4

16

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

5

15%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

11

32%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.