LAWRENCE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL-BROADWAY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

177

36%

LEVEL 2

137

28%

LEVEL 3

98

20%

LEVEL 4

78

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

131

27%

LEVEL 2

141

29%

LEVEL 3

120

25%

LEVEL 4

86

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

85

36%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

67

28%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

92

36%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

41

16%

LEVEL 4

47

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

64

27%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

45

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

10

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

9

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

29
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

12

23%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

18

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

32
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

20

41%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

36

40%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

19

21%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

21

27%

LEVEL 2

26

34%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

11

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

96
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

119

39%

LEVEL 2

91

30%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

124
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

97

31%

LEVEL 2

95

30%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

137

32%

LEVEL 2

125

29%

LEVEL 3

93

22%

LEVEL 4

76

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

107

25%

LEVEL 2

128

29%

LEVEL 3

116

27%

LEVEL 4

83

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

40

68%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

24

55%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

165
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

98

27%

LEVEL 2

97

27%

LEVEL 3

89

25%

LEVEL 4

76

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

186
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

96

28%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

83

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

79

61%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

20
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

66

50%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

18

22%

LEVEL 2

23

28%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

22

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

15

19%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

25

31%

LEVEL 4

17

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

159

39%

LEVEL 2

114

28%

LEVEL 3

79

19%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

116

29%

LEVEL 2

117

29%

LEVEL 3

95

24%

LEVEL 4

69

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

175
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

173

36%

LEVEL 2

136

28%

LEVEL 3

97

20%

LEVEL 4

78

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.