HEWLETT-WOODMERE UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

292
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

63

14%

LEVEL 2

106

23%

LEVEL 3

172

37%

LEVEL 4

120

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

336
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

60

12%

LEVEL 2

122

24%

LEVEL 3

177

34%

LEVEL 4

159

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

74

36%

LEVEL 4

49

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

84

35%

LEVEL 4

62

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

169
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

48

19%

LEVEL 3

98

38%

LEVEL 4

71

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

190
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

60

21%

LEVEL 3

93

33%

LEVEL 4

97

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

56
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

27

39%

LEVEL 4

29

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

68
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

26

33%

LEVEL 4

42

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

56

23%

LEVEL 3

98

40%

LEVEL 4

69

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

195
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

64

23%

LEVEL 3

98

35%

LEVEL 4

97

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

14

25%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

16

29%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

20

36%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

15

21%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

29

40%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

16

19%

LEVEL 2

31

36%

LEVEL 3

27

31%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

289
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

103

24%

LEVEL 3

170

39%

LEVEL 4

119

28%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

331
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

34

7%

LEVEL 2

117

24%

LEVEL 3

173

36%

LEVEL 4

158

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

24

80%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

26

72%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

291
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

57

13%

LEVEL 2

104

23%

LEVEL 3

171

38%

LEVEL 4

120

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

334
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

55

11%

LEVEL 2

112

22%

LEVEL 3

176

35%

LEVEL 4

158

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

10

59%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

238
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

82

23%

LEVEL 3

135

38%

LEVEL 4

103

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

278
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

85

22%

LEVEL 3

138

35%

LEVEL 4

140

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

28

26%

LEVEL 2

24

23%

LEVEL 3

37

35%

LEVEL 4

17

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

28

23%

LEVEL 2

37

30%

LEVEL 3

39

32%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

290
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

58

13%

LEVEL 2

106

23%

LEVEL 3

171

38%

LEVEL 4

119

26%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

334
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

57

11%

LEVEL 2

120

23%

LEVEL 3

176

34%

LEVEL 4

158

31%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.