Skip to Content
Main content

LEO F GIBLYN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

80

34%

LEVEL 4

47

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

55

26%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

56

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

44

41%

LEVEL 4

20

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

33

29%

LEVEL 3

36

32%

LEVEL 4

27

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

36

29%

LEVEL 4

27

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

15

15%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

32

33%

LEVEL 4

29

30%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

20

41%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

16

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

79
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

58

37%

LEVEL 3

53

34%

LEVEL 4

26

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

25

18%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

31

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

78

35%

LEVEL 4

46

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

28

14%

LEVEL 2

50

25%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

56

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

120
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

76

39%

LEVEL 4

44

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

113
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

40

24%

LEVEL 3

61

37%

LEVEL 4

52

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

18

50%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

18

41%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

14

23%

LEVEL 4

20

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

19

27%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

25

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

56

33%

LEVEL 3

66

38%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

25

18%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

47

34%

LEVEL 4

31

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.