ARCHER STREET SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

57

22%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

87

33%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

47

18%

LEVEL 2

83

31%

LEVEL 3

87

33%

LEVEL 4

50

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

29

21%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

41

30%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

25

18%

LEVEL 2

47

34%

LEVEL 3

41

30%

LEVEL 4

25

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

28

22%

LEVEL 2

35

27%

LEVEL 3

46

36%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

36

28%

LEVEL 3

46

36%

LEVEL 4

25

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

6

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

13

42%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

12

33%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

98
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

49

24%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

69

33%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

108
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

32

15%

LEVEL 2

67

32%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

41

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

40

17%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

85

36%

LEVEL 4

39

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

41

16%

LEVEL 2

81

31%

LEVEL 3

86

33%

LEVEL 4

50

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

17

63%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

104
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

24

13%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

68

37%

LEVEL 4

36

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

114
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

70

36%

LEVEL 4

44

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

22
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

33

41%

LEVEL 2

26

32%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

23
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

20

27%

LEVEL 2

31

42%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

21

40%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

20

36%

LEVEL 4

17

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

52

25%

LEVEL 2

64

30%

LEVEL 3

66

31%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

40

19%

LEVEL 2

71

34%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

33

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

125
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

55

21%

LEVEL 2

76

30%

LEVEL 3

86

34%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

134
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

78

31%

LEVEL 3

84

33%

LEVEL 4

50

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.