BAYVIEW AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

50

24%

LEVEL 3

77

36%

LEVEL 4

50

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

47

21%

LEVEL 3

78

35%

LEVEL 4

70

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

15

16%

LEVEL 2

26

28%

LEVEL 3

34

36%

LEVEL 4

19

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

11

11%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

39

39%

LEVEL 4

29

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

20

17%

LEVEL 2

24

20%

LEVEL 3

43

36%

LEVEL 4

31

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

25

21%

LEVEL 3

39

33%

LEVEL 4

41

34%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

7

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

21

46%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

7

14%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

19

39%

LEVEL 4

13

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

25

18%

LEVEL 2

35

25%

LEVEL 3

46

33%

LEVEL 4

32

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

97
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

34

23%

LEVEL 3

49

33%

LEVEL 4

48

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

74

39%

LEVEL 4

50

26%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

45

21%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

69

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

112
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

29

19%

LEVEL 3

65

42%

LEVEL 4

47

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

127
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

33

19%

LEVEL 3

59

34%

LEVEL 4

68

39%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

15
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

20

36%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

21
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

13

27%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

19

40%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

28

48%

LEVEL 4

14

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

26

37%

LEVEL 4

26

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

36

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

52

35%

LEVEL 4

44

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.