SEAFORD UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

91

27%

LEVEL 3

131

38%

LEVEL 4

84

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

103

28%

LEVEL 3

136

36%

LEVEL 4

102

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

65

38%

LEVEL 4

43

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

46

24%

LEVEL 3

77

41%

LEVEL 4

55

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

44

26%

LEVEL 3

66

39%

LEVEL 4

41

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

59

32%

LEVEL 4

47

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

6

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

187
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

70

25%

LEVEL 3

113

40%

LEVEL 4

74

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

207
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

86

27%

LEVEL 3

121

38%

LEVEL 4

86

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

13

46%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

7

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

81

26%

LEVEL 3

126

41%

LEVEL 4

84

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

88

26%

LEVEL 3

131

39%

LEVEL 4

102

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

16

52%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

18

47%

LEVEL 2

15

39%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

214
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

86

26%

LEVEL 3

130

39%

LEVEL 4

84

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

235
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

98

27%

LEVEL 3

135

37%

LEVEL 4

100

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

192
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

75

25%

LEVEL 3

115

39%

LEVEL 4

77

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

215
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

26

8%

LEVEL 2

90

27%

LEVEL 3

122

37%

LEVEL 4

93

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

16

35%

LEVEL 3

16

35%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

7

16%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

9

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.