Skip to Content
Main content

NORTH BELLMORE UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

67

14%

LEVEL 2

146

31%

LEVEL 3

158

34%

LEVEL 4

97

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

305
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

78

15%

LEVEL 2

149

28%

LEVEL 3

203

38%

LEVEL 4

102

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

28

12%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

81

36%

LEVEL 4

47

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

156
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

72

27%

LEVEL 3

104

39%

LEVEL 4

52

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

39

16%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

77

32%

LEVEL 4

50

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

149
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

99

37%

LEVEL 4

50

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

5

38%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

13

20%

LEVEL 4

26

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

50
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

9

12%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

25

32%

LEVEL 4

25

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

42

14%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

109

35%

LEVEL 4

58

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

195
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

44

13%

LEVEL 2

92

28%

LEVEL 3

139

42%

LEVEL 4

56

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

9

35%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

15

22%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

26

39%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

13

15%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

29

35%

LEVEL 4

15

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

42

10%

LEVEL 2

126

31%

LEVEL 3

150

36%

LEVEL 4

95

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

295
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

51

11%

LEVEL 2

130

27%

LEVEL 3

195

41%

LEVEL 4

100

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

25

45%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

27

48%

LEVEL 2

19

34%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

255
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

60

13%

LEVEL 2

145

32%

LEVEL 3

158

34%

LEVEL 4

97

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

304
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

73

14%

LEVEL 2

146

28%

LEVEL 3

202

39%

LEVEL 4

102

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

233
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

47

12%

LEVEL 2

120

30%

LEVEL 3

144

36%

LEVEL 4

89

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

270
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

49

11%

LEVEL 2

121

28%

LEVEL 3

185

42%

LEVEL 4

85

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

20

29%

LEVEL 2

26

38%

LEVEL 3

14

21%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

29

32%

LEVEL 2

28

30%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

17

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.