WOODLAND MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

281
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

101

24%

LEVEL 3

141

34%

LEVEL 4

140

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

81

20%

LEVEL 3

160

40%

LEVEL 4

138

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

46

24%

LEVEL 3

74

38%

LEVEL 4

68

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

144
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

71

38%

LEVEL 4

73

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

72

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

154
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

46

21%

LEVEL 3

89

41%

LEVEL 4

65

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

101
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

18

15%

LEVEL 3

41

33%

LEVEL 4

60

48%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

99
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

19

16%

LEVEL 3

42

35%

LEVEL 4

57

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

58

36%

LEVEL 4

56

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

25

15%

LEVEL 3

79

47%

LEVEL 4

61

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

36

35%

LEVEL 3

34

33%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

32

34%

LEVEL 4

17

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

90

24%

LEVEL 3

134

36%

LEVEL 4

134

36%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

67

18%

LEVEL 3

150

41%

LEVEL 4

135

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

14

37%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

11

29%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

280
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

28

7%

LEVEL 2

95

24%

LEVEL 3

140

35%

LEVEL 4

140

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

295
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

80

20%

LEVEL 3

159

41%

LEVEL 4

136

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

199
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

99

36%

LEVEL 4

100

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

228
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

49

17%

LEVEL 3

119

41%

LEVEL 4

109

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

25

18%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

42

30%

LEVEL 4

40

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

13

11%

LEVEL 2

32

28%

LEVEL 3

41

36%

LEVEL 4

29

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.