BOWLING GREEN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

20

7%

LEVEL 3

82

30%

LEVEL 4

150

55%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

27

9%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

181

59%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

8

6%

LEVEL 3

38

30%

LEVEL 4

71

57%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

10

7%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

84

60%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

12

8%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

79

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

17

10%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

97

58%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

81
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

26

30%

LEVEL 4

55

64%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

85
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

25

26%

LEVEL 4

60

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

65

68%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

6

6%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

81

74%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

16

20%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

26

32%

LEVEL 4

27

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

11

13%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

27

31%

LEVEL 4

36

42%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

11

5%

LEVEL 3

71

31%

LEVEL 4

145

63%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

21

8%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

172

64%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

19

43%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

11

25%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

9

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

225
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

14

6%

LEVEL 3

78

31%

LEVEL 4

147

58%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

257
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

21

7%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

181

63%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

8

4%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

128

66%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

205
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

12

5%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

151

68%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

15

19%

LEVEL 2

12

15%

LEVEL 3

31

39%

LEVEL 4

22

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

13

15%

LEVEL 2

15

18%

LEVEL 3

26

31%

LEVEL 4

30

36%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.