JACKSON ANNEX SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

126

43%

LEVEL 2

84

29%

LEVEL 3

50

17%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

130

41%

LEVEL 2

105

33%

LEVEL 3

61

19%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

50

39%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

55

39%

LEVEL 2

52

37%

LEVEL 3

21

15%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

76

46%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

75

42%

LEVEL 2

53

30%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

29

63%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

35

60%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

89

39%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

90

36%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

52

21%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

103

39%

LEVEL 2

83

31%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

96

35%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

59

21%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

23

88%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

34

83%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

63
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

57

35%

LEVEL 2

45

27%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

29

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

64
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

64

35%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

19
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

69

54%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

20
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

66

48%

LEVEL 2

51

37%

LEVEL 3

17

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

32

62%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

35

44%

LEVEL 2

27

34%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

94

39%

LEVEL 2

72

30%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

95

40%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

50
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

80

44%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

32
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

46

41%

LEVEL 2

33

30%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.