Skip to Content
Main content

ALVERTA B GRAY SCHULTZ MIDDLE SCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,059

LEVEL 1

750

71%

LEVEL 2

201

19%

LEVEL 3

82

8%

LEVEL 4

26

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 864

LEVEL 1

530

61%

LEVEL 2

217

25%

LEVEL 3

85

10%

LEVEL 4

32

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

328

67%

LEVEL 2

108

22%

LEVEL 3

40

8%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

247

62%

LEVEL 2

105

26%

LEVEL 3

39

10%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

422

74%

LEVEL 2

93

16%

LEVEL 3

42

7%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

283

61%

LEVEL 2

112

24%

LEVEL 3

46

10%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

6

86%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

31

67%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

17

65%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

185

79%

LEVEL 2

32

14%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

125

69%

LEVEL 2

39

22%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

80
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 764

LEVEL 1

531

70%

LEVEL 2

153

20%

LEVEL 3

64

8%

LEVEL 4

16

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

95
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

385

60%

LEVEL 2

163

25%

LEVEL 3

68

11%

LEVEL 4

27

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 954

LEVEL 1

652

68%

LEVEL 2

197

21%

LEVEL 3

79

8%

LEVEL 4

26

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 775

LEVEL 1

449

58%

LEVEL 2

212

27%

LEVEL 3

83

11%

LEVEL 4

31

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

98

93%

LEVEL 2

4

4%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

81

91%

LEVEL 2

5

6%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

102
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 625

LEVEL 1

366

59%

LEVEL 2

157

25%

LEVEL 3

76

12%

LEVEL 4

26

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

115
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

270

48%

LEVEL 2

183

32%

LEVEL 3

83

15%

LEVEL 4

32

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

384

88%

LEVEL 2

44

10%

LEVEL 3

6

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

260

88%

LEVEL 2

34

11%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

133

78%

LEVEL 2

28

16%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

177

63%

LEVEL 2

59

21%

LEVEL 3

33

12%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 889

LEVEL 1

617

69%

LEVEL 2

173

19%

LEVEL 3

76

9%

LEVEL 4

23

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

353

60%

LEVEL 2

158

27%

LEVEL 3

52

9%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

91
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 784

LEVEL 1

537

68%

LEVEL 2

156

20%

LEVEL 3

68

9%

LEVEL 4

23

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

213

77%

LEVEL 2

45

16%

LEVEL 3

14

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.