JOSEPH MCNEIL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

248

63%

LEVEL 2

85

22%

LEVEL 3

44

11%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

202

55%

LEVEL 2

88

24%

LEVEL 3

60

16%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

128

65%

LEVEL 2

43

22%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

111

59%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

120

62%

LEVEL 2

42

22%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

91

51%

LEVEL 2

44

25%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

80

69%

LEVEL 2

24

21%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

65

58%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

163

62%

LEVEL 2

58

22%

LEVEL 3

31

12%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

135

55%

LEVEL 2

56

23%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

212

60%

LEVEL 2

83

24%

LEVEL 3

42

12%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

188

55%

LEVEL 2

83

24%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

36

90%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

14

61%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

60
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

148

53%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

70
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

115

45%

LEVEL 2

71

28%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

100

88%

LEVEL 2

13

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

87

78%

LEVEL 2

17

15%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

44

69%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

57

55%

LEVEL 2

23

22%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

204

62%

LEVEL 2

74

22%

LEVEL 3

38

12%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

145

55%

LEVEL 2

65

25%

LEVEL 3

42

16%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

51
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

163

60%

LEVEL 2

56

21%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

85

69%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.