Skip to Content
Main content

FONDA-FULTONVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 553

LEVEL 1

87

16%

LEVEL 2

176

32%

LEVEL 3

187

34%

LEVEL 4

103

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

287
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

87

16%

LEVEL 2

163

30%

LEVEL 3

164

31%

LEVEL 4

123

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

94

35%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

83

32%

LEVEL 4

58

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

48

17%

LEVEL 2

85

30%

LEVEL 3

93

33%

LEVEL 4

57

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

146
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

50

18%

LEVEL 2

81

29%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

65

23%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

271
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

82

16%

LEVEL 2

168

32%

LEVEL 3

178

34%

LEVEL 4

93

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

268
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

75

15%

LEVEL 2

157

31%

LEVEL 3

154

31%

LEVEL 4

114

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

277
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

53

11%

LEVEL 2

154

32%

LEVEL 3

177

37%

LEVEL 4

100

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

276
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

43

9%

LEVEL 2

141

31%

LEVEL 3

159

35%

LEVEL 4

117

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

34

49%

LEVEL 2

22

32%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

44

57%

LEVEL 2

22

29%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

207
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

95

28%

LEVEL 3

128

38%

LEVEL 4

79

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

189
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

80

27%

LEVEL 3

97

33%

LEVEL 4

92

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

55

25%

LEVEL 2

81

37%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

62

26%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

285
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

85

16%

LEVEL 2

175

32%

LEVEL 3

183

34%

LEVEL 4

102

19%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

282
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

86

16%

LEVEL 2

161

30%

LEVEL 3

161

30%

LEVEL 4

121

23%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

285
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

85

16%

LEVEL 2

162

30%

LEVEL 3

162

30%

LEVEL 4

123

23%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.