Skip to Content
Main content

WILBUR H LYNCH LITERACY ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

365

67%

LEVEL 2

123

22%

LEVEL 3

49

9%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 597

LEVEL 1

417

70%

LEVEL 2

126

21%

LEVEL 3

42

7%

LEVEL 4

12

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

164

63%

LEVEL 2

65

25%

LEVEL 3

25

10%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

194

70%

LEVEL 2

55

20%

LEVEL 3

24

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

201

70%

LEVEL 2

58

20%

LEVEL 3

24

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

223

69%

LEVEL 2

71

22%

LEVEL 3

18

6%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

16

59%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

35
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

113

55%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

34
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

134

58%

LEVEL 2

64

28%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

32

84%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

31

78%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

205

75%

LEVEL 2

50

18%

LEVEL 3

17

6%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

231

80%

LEVEL 2

47

16%

LEVEL 3

9

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

273

61%

LEVEL 2

118

26%

LEVEL 3

47

10%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

325

65%

LEVEL 2

121

24%

LEVEL 3

42

8%

LEVEL 4

12

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

92

93%

LEVEL 2

5

5%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

92

95%

LEVEL 2

5

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

60
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

315

64%

LEVEL 2

120

24%

LEVEL 3

49

10%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

54
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

363

67%

LEVEL 2

125

23%

LEVEL 3

42

8%

LEVEL 4

12

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

50

94%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

54

98%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

70

49%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

62

46%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

295

73%

LEVEL 2

85

21%

LEVEL 3

24

6%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

355

77%

LEVEL 2

81

18%

LEVEL 3

20

4%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

60
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

347

66%

LEVEL 2

120

23%

LEVEL 3

49

9%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

54
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

403

70%

LEVEL 2

118

21%

LEVEL 3

42

7%

LEVEL 4

12

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

18

86%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

14

64%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.