Skip to Content
Main content

EAST ROCHESTER UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

96

36%

LEVEL 4

54

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

76

27%

LEVEL 3

103

37%

LEVEL 4

59

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

43

33%

LEVEL 3

45

35%

LEVEL 4

31

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

47

35%

LEVEL 4

30

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

22

16%

LEVEL 2

42

30%

LEVEL 3

51

37%

LEVEL 4

23

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

56

38%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

50

28%

LEVEL 3

73

41%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

78

38%

LEVEL 4

45

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

19

46%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

10

40%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

10

27%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

12

30%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

87

36%

LEVEL 4

54

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

97

41%

LEVEL 4

57

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

11

38%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

22

52%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

150
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

83

32%

LEVEL 3

96

37%

LEVEL 4

54

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

162
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

40

15%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

103

38%

LEVEL 4

59

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

29

23%

LEVEL 3

50

40%

LEVEL 4

35

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

56

40%

LEVEL 4

38

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

23

16%

LEVEL 2

56

39%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

31

22%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

47

34%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.