PITTSFORD CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,485
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,935

LEVEL 1

127

7%

LEVEL 2

323

17%

LEVEL 3

660

34%

LEVEL 4

825

43%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,532
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,938

LEVEL 1

107

6%

LEVEL 2

299

15%

LEVEL 3

624

32%

LEVEL 4

908

47%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

721
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 946

LEVEL 1

66

7%

LEVEL 2

159

17%

LEVEL 3

317

34%

LEVEL 4

404

43%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

709
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 913

LEVEL 1

49

5%

LEVEL 2

155

17%

LEVEL 3

298

33%

LEVEL 4

411

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

764
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 989

LEVEL 1

61

6%

LEVEL 2

164

17%

LEVEL 3

343

35%

LEVEL 4

421

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

823
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,025

LEVEL 1

58

6%

LEVEL 2

144

14%

LEVEL 3

326

32%

LEVEL 4

497

48%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

93
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

18

16%

LEVEL 3

38

33%

LEVEL 4

55

47%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

104
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

10

8%

LEVEL 3

36

30%

LEVEL 4

68

56%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

189
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

19

9%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

142

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

209
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

17

7%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

155

66%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,097
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,423

LEVEL 1

83

6%

LEVEL 2

243

17%

LEVEL 3

516

36%

LEVEL 4

581

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,110
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,403

LEVEL 1

67

5%

LEVEL 2

226

16%

LEVEL 3

479

34%

LEVEL 4

631

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

72
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

22

20%

LEVEL 3

37

33%

LEVEL 4

35

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

13

11%

LEVEL 2

32

28%

LEVEL 3

28

25%

LEVEL 4

41

36%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,436
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,767

LEVEL 1

61

3%

LEVEL 2

270

15%

LEVEL 3

632

36%

LEVEL 4

804

46%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,459
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,764

LEVEL 1

51

3%

LEVEL 2

254

14%

LEVEL 3

580

33%

LEVEL 4

879

50%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

49
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

66

39%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

28

17%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

73
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

56

32%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,475
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,916

LEVEL 1

122

6%

LEVEL 2

319

17%

LEVEL 3

654

34%

LEVEL 4

821

43%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,524
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,919

LEVEL 1

100

5%

LEVEL 2

295

15%

LEVEL 3

620

32%

LEVEL 4

904

47%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,453
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,879

LEVEL 1

115

6%

LEVEL 2

311

17%

LEVEL 3

639

34%

LEVEL 4

814

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,500
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,878

LEVEL 1

96

5%

LEVEL 2

282

15%

LEVEL 3

606

32%

LEVEL 4

894

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

21

38%

LEVEL 4

11

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

11

18%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

18

30%

LEVEL 4

14

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.