Skip to Content
Main content

MENDON CENTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

293
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

54

15%

LEVEL 3

126

34%

LEVEL 4

167

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

307
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

63

16%

LEVEL 3

124

32%

LEVEL 4

183

47%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

27

15%

LEVEL 3

60

34%

LEVEL 4

80

45%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

36

20%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

83

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

153
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

27

14%

LEVEL 3

66

35%

LEVEL 4

87

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

169
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

27

13%

LEVEL 3

69

33%

LEVEL 4

100

49%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

23
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

13

46%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

25
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

12

46%

LEVEL 4

13

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

64
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

52

73%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

76
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

5

6%

LEVEL 3

15

18%

LEVEL 4

61

73%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

39

17%

LEVEL 3

92

39%

LEVEL 4

87

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

183
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

50

20%

LEVEL 3

85

35%

LEVEL 4

98

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

12

46%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

7

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

43

13%

LEVEL 3

122

36%

LEVEL 4

163

48%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

293
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

56

16%

LEVEL 3

116

32%

LEVEL 4

177

49%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

7

25%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

304
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

63

17%

LEVEL 3

124

33%

LEVEL 4

180

47%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

288
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

53

15%

LEVEL 3

123

34%

LEVEL 4

165

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

300
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

61

16%

LEVEL 3

120

32%

LEVEL 4

180

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.