ANNA MURRAY-DOUGLASS ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

355

74%

LEVEL 2

61

13%

LEVEL 3

43

9%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

313

67%

LEVEL 2

89

19%

LEVEL 3

45

10%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

192

76%

LEVEL 2

31

12%

LEVEL 3

20

8%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

168

70%

LEVEL 2

45

19%

LEVEL 3

22

9%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

163

71%

LEVEL 2

30

13%

LEVEL 3

23

10%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

145

65%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

23

10%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

15

31%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

12

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

18

35%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

205

80%

LEVEL 2

31

12%

LEVEL 3

17

7%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

181

74%

LEVEL 2

45

18%

LEVEL 3

14

6%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

126

78%

LEVEL 2

18

11%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

108

69%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

266

69%

LEVEL 2

59

15%

LEVEL 3

40

10%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

239

63%

LEVEL 2

83

22%

LEVEL 3

42

11%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

89

94%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

74

88%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

61
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

257

70%

LEVEL 2

50

14%

LEVEL 3

39

11%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

58
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

222

63%

LEVEL 2

74

21%

LEVEL 3

42

12%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

98

87%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

91

82%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

17

33%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

11

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

25

40%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

12

19%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

338

79%

LEVEL 2

51

12%

LEVEL 3

29

7%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

288

72%

LEVEL 2

71

18%

LEVEL 3

33

8%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

64
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

319

72%

LEVEL 2

61

14%

LEVEL 3

43

10%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

63
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

291

66%

LEVEL 2

84

19%

LEVEL 3

45

10%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

36

97%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

22

81%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.