Skip to Content
Main content

IDA B WELLS-BARNETT ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

40
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

175

66%

LEVEL 2

51

19%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

28
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

174

65%

LEVEL 2

65

24%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

19
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

92

69%

LEVEL 2

23

17%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

81

65%

LEVEL 2

31

25%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

83

63%

LEVEL 2

28

21%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

93

65%

LEVEL 2

34

24%

LEVEL 3

13

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

26

62%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

25

61%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

95

64%

LEVEL 2

32

22%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

100

66%

LEVEL 2

34

23%

LEVEL 3

17

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

40

69%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

37

62%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

40
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

121

59%

LEVEL 2

44

21%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

27
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

126

60%

LEVEL 2

56

27%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

54

89%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

48

83%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

38
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

140

62%

LEVEL 2

49

22%

LEVEL 3

28

12%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

28
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

144

62%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

35

90%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

30

91%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

13

68%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

168

66%

LEVEL 2

48

19%

LEVEL 3

27

11%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

161

65%

LEVEL 2

63

25%

LEVEL 3

23

9%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

37
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

165

66%

LEVEL 2

49

20%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

28
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

165

65%

LEVEL 2

59

23%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.