WILLINK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

276
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

64

13%

LEVEL 2

145

30%

LEVEL 3

141

29%

LEVEL 4

135

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

72

13%

LEVEL 2

167

31%

LEVEL 3

172

32%

LEVEL 4

126

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

60

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

143
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

91

37%

LEVEL 4

52

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

41

16%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

66

26%

LEVEL 4

75

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

155
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

42

15%

LEVEL 2

91

32%

LEVEL 3

81

28%

LEVEL 4

74

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

11

61%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

244
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

47

11%

LEVEL 2

126

30%

LEVEL 3

128

31%

LEVEL 4

116

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

269
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

52

11%

LEVEL 2

138

30%

LEVEL 3

158

34%

LEVEL 4

111

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

10

34%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

44

10%

LEVEL 2

134

30%

LEVEL 3

139

31%

LEVEL 4

135

30%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

293
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

48

10%

LEVEL 2

160

32%

LEVEL 3

167

33%

LEVEL 4

126

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

20

61%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

24

67%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

250
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

47

11%

LEVEL 2

117

28%

LEVEL 3

122

29%

LEVEL 4

128

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

270
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

42

10%

LEVEL 2

129

29%

LEVEL 3

152

34%

LEVEL 4

118

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

17

24%

LEVEL 2

28

39%

LEVEL 3

19

27%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

30

31%

LEVEL 2

38

40%

LEVEL 3

20

21%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.